home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Claus Brod <clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com>
- Subject: Re: call for discussion: Standard paths for MiNT
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 9:56:25 MEZ
- In-Reply-To: <199401110743.AA22018@avignon.daimi.aau.dk>; from "Christian Lynbech" at Jan 11, 94 8:43 am
- Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
-
- > The SYSV solution seems to have been promoted a few times now. Let me
- > just add that it may be worth to keep an eye how LINUX is doeing
- > things. Among other things, there will be a port to 68k machines at
- > some point, so beong compatible with that may be worth something.
-
- Excellent point! Let's join forces with the Linux 68k people here.
- Does somebody have the address for the Linux 68k mailing list?
- In general: Let's try to find out what the major UNIX's path
- structure is like. For HPUX, I can say that they are still BSD-like,
- but moving towards a V.4 structure gradually. Let's make a list!
- Quite obviously, we need some more information here.
-
- > Later we need to decide where put other stuff. Everything not covered
- > by the standard should probably go into /usr/local, but since we are
-
- ... or /usr/contrib
-
- > goeing the gnu way, what about a program like gzip? And if emacs is
- > goeing to be the standard editor, should it still reside in
- > /usr/local? There are a zillion question like these.
-
- Sure, but let's first get the general structure agreed upon, or we
- will get lost in details. We can decide such questions later.
-
- --clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com-----------------------------------------------
- Claus Brod, MDD, HP Boeblingen Magic is real unless declared integer.
- --#include <std_disclaimer>-----------------------------------------------
-